[Fwd: Re: [PD] distortion]

[Yves Degoyon]

good, but no "abs" function in expr~ here ! !

am i out of sync ??

cheers,

yves

David McCallum wrote:

 >
 > Oh, neat! I tried doing expr~ before but used the sample-specific
 > notation and not the vectors (I didn't/don't really understand the
 > vector aspect of DSP.)
 >
 > I wanted to use tabread4~ because I assumed that it would be less
 > processor intensive than an expr~. Does anybody have any experience,
 > data on this?
 >
 > David McCallum
 >
 >
 > At 09:09 AM 11/05/02 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
 >
 >> I wouldn't write this into a table but instead use the expr~ family.
 >> Unless more 'GEN' functions besides "sinesums" get implemented widely,
 >> expr~ is a better way for this kind of waveshaping. I tested some
 >> waveshaping methods in my dirty waveshaper patch available at
 >> http://footils.radio-worldwi.de (soon footils.org, btw.)
 >>
 >> Your example is attached.
 >>
 >> ciao,
 >> --
 >> Frank Barknecht _ _______footils__
 >>
 >
 > .
 > . David McCallum
 > . Queen's University Electronic Music Studio Manager
 > . and Noise Maker
 > . html://mentalfloss.ca/sintheta/
 > .
 >
 >
 >
 >