[PD] pddp - a proposal

[jfm3]

I "ported" the documentation to SGML a a while ago. If you're all
interested, let me know and I'll dig it out again.

On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 19:35, martin wrote:
> I am of the opinion that HTML output for pd documentation if highly
> desirable. However, I would stress that HTML is probably not the best format
> to actually author and maintain such documentation.
> 
> Which raises the point: does anyone have any experience, or good pointers to
> existing documentation projects (for other subjects), documentation
> maintainence, and documentation formats (such as DocBook and SGML)?
> 
> - martin
> 
> > p.s.: I would suggest that the documentation should be HTML format (rather
> > than pdf, ps, etc.) because:
> > 1.  everybody with a web browser can participate in development of such a
> > document.
> > 2.  everybody with a web browser can access the documentation.
> > 3.  the documentation can provide downloadable examples.
> > 4.  etc. etc.
> 
> 
> 
-- 
(jfm3)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 184 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20020516/aaac93a7/attachment.pgp>