[PD] table to receive?

[Krzysztof Czaja]

hi Frank,

I seem to suffer from a terrible mail delivery delay here, so your
answer has come too late -- its the same solution.  I would rather
use <range> -> [until] -> <a counter>, than [for++], though...

Krzysztof

Frank Barknecht wrote:
...
 > I'm not sure, if it's the best way, but I once did this with a fast [for++]
 > from IEMLIB and a [tabread]. See example, where the for++ is slow.