[PD] pd OSX with an emagic 2|6

[shreeswifty]

Ok well at least i have an answer!
thank you so much for tracking that for me.
knowing Phil and the jsyn folxx it should not be too long.
thanks Mark


Pat Pagano, Director
South East Just Intonation Society
http://www.screwmusicforever.com/SHREESWIFT/
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Khemma <mkhemma at orion.it.luc.edu>
To: shreeswifty <ppagano at bellsouth.net>
Cc: PD-LiST <pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] pd OSX with an emagic 2|6


>
>
> this is what the readme from portaudio says about mac core sound:
>
>
> " Notes on Core Audio Implementation of PortAudio
>
> by Phil Burk and Darren Gibbs
>
> Document last updated March 20, 2002
>
> WHAT WORKS
>
> Output with very low latency, <10 msec.
> Half duplex input or output.
> Full duplex on the same CoreAudio device.
> The paFLoat32, paInt16, paInt8, paUInt8 sample formats.
> Pa_GetCPULoad()
> Pa_StreamTime()
>
> KNOWN BUGS OR LIMITATIONS
>
> We do not yet support simultaneous input and output on different
> devices. Note that some CoreAudio devices like the Roland UH30 look
> like one device but are actually two different CoreAudio devices. The
> BuiltIn audio is typically one CoreAudio device.
>
> Mono doesn't work.
>
> DEVICE MAPPING
>
> CoreAudio devices can support both input and output. But the sample
> rates supported may be different. So we have map one or two PortAudio
> device to each CoreAudio device depending on whether it supports
> input, output or both.
>
> When we query devices, we first get a list of CoreAudio devices. Then
> we scan the list and add a PortAudio device for each CoreAudio device
> that supports input. Then we make a scan for output devices."
>
>
> so it seems for the moment that you can only get half duplex with your 2|6
> on OSX :(
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, shreeswifty wrote:
>
> > Dear folks
> > i would like to use my emagic 2|6 for audio input but when i run pd i
get
> >
> > "PortAudio input and output must use same core Audio device"
> >
> > apparently it sees the emagic as default #0 Input and  default #1 output
> >
> > is there a work round for this?
> > cheers~
> >
> > Pat
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>