[PD] $0-inconsistency

[Frank Barknecht]

Hi,

I found a strange behaviour with $0-symbols. I'd like to use a
$0-named table in an abstraction. With my pd-test26 I cannot build a
symbol to change the contents of the table. The attached patches may
make this clearer. On "bang" it gives an error like: 
  error: 1001-bug: no such object 
although only "$0-bug" is used, which should throw the same number
everywhere in the abstraction.

Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong?

ciao,
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                               _ ______footils.org__
-------------- next part --------------
#N canvas 0 0 450 300 10;
#X obj 131 133 bugtable;
#X msg 130 101 bang;
#X connect 1 0 0 0;
-------------- next part --------------
#N canvas 0 0 450 300 10;
#N canvas 0 0 600 400 1001-bug 0;
#N canvas 0 0 450 300 graph1 0;
#X array 1000-bug 515 float 0;
#X coords 0 1 514 -1 500 300 1;
#X restore 50 50 graph;
#X restore 122 102 table \$0-bug;
#X obj 222 103 symbol \$0-bug;
#X msg 222 78 bang;
#X msg 222 132 \; \$1 sinesum 512 1;
#X obj 224 50 inlet;
#X connect 1 0 3 0;
#X connect 2 0 1 0;
#X connect 4 0 2 0;