geiger at xdv.org
Mon Jul 22 21:15:03 CEST 2002
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, CK wrote:
> I read:
> > it isnt so at the moment, but it could be done this way.
> I don't think so since ...
> > There isnt too much memory allocation, live patching being the
> > most problematic case (but loosing this feature would be really bad).
> which requires abstraction loading
you are right, didnt think of that.
Probably it is possible to load a patch in another thread and hook it
into the system when it is done ?
More information about the Pd-list