[PD] bugs and question
czaja at chopin.edu.pl
Sat Sep 7 14:35:01 CEST 2002
do not hesitate to be harsh! I really do appreciate your expertise,
so please, come straight to the point -- do you mean that
1. Pd is not reliable? (What is then?)
2. Simple (or is it simplistic?) design is not relevant to
reliability of, in effect, a single-man's project?
3. The feature of being able to define new atom types does not
complicate the design (this is quite possible, hence my
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
perhaps this 'minimalistic' attitude is one of the reasons, why Pd
>>is (still!) a reliable performance tool...
> To be nice with you I will call that an 'opinion'.
More information about the Pd-list