[PD] bugs and question

[Krzysztof Czaja]

Mathieu,

do not hesitate to be harsh! I really do appreciate your expertise,
so please, come straight to the point -- do you mean that

1. Pd is not reliable?  (What is then?)

2. Simple (or is it simplistic?) design is not relevant to
reliability of, in effect, a single-man's project?

3. The feature of being able to define new atom types does not
complicate the design (this is quite possible, hence my
'perhaps')?

Krzysztof

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
...
perhaps this 'minimalistic' attitude is one of the reasons, why Pd
 >>is (still!) a reliable performance tool...
...
 > To be nice with you I will call that an 'opinion'.