[PD] bugs and question

Mathieu Bouchard matju at sympatico.ca
Tue Sep 24 03:15:39 CEST 2002

On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:

> do not hesitate to be harsh! I really do appreciate your expertise,
> so please, come straight to the point -- do you mean that
> 1. Pd is not reliable?  (What is then?)
> 2. Simple (or is it simplistic?) design is not relevant to
> reliability of, in effect, a single-man's project?
> 3. The feature of being able to define new atom types does not
> complicate the design (this is quite possible, hence my
> 'perhaps')?

PD seems reliable, however the absence of that feature is a problem that
prevents some kinds of externals to be written cleanly.


More information about the Pd-list mailing list