[PD] Anybody still interested in pd-scheme?

Orm Finnendahl finnendahl at folkwang-hochschule.de
Mon Dec 30 21:34:24 CET 2002

Hi Larry,

well, I'm not really using it anymore although I find extensibility
through scheme *very* useful. It's more that I don't like to fool
around with too many interpreters and siod definitely wouldn't be my
first choice as it is not maintained anymore. Did you think about some
integration with guile? I guess that way maybe the full functionality
of common music could be available from within pd and vice
versa. Right now I'm interfacing using files or a combination of
netsend/netreceive and named pipes but I could imagine a somewhat
tighter integration.

Any thoughts?


Am Sonntag, den 29. Dezember 2002 um 21:40:39 Uhr (-0500) schrieb
Larry Troxler:

> Hi, I'd like to know if anybody on this list is actually using or
> planning to use my scheme extern:
> http://www.westnet.com/~lt/pd/index.html
> I think that the version there is not the newest, and I've since been
> writing stuff to import scheme sequences into Common Music, etc, but
> really, if nobody else is using this (which is perfectly fine by me)
> then I don't have to bother with documentation, version control,
> posting, and all that stuff...
> So, if anybody is actually using this thing, let me know. Otherwise it
> will save me a bit of time :-)
> Larry
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list

More information about the Pd-list mailing list