[PD] pdp/pidip observation

[Yves Degoyon]

hi,

just to clear up some points about pdp_qt/pdp_yqt :

pdp_yqt is an early version of tom's pdp_qt
that i have tweaked to add the audio support,
all the video decoding stuff was taken form pdp_qt
( i think from version 0.3 ).

cheers,

sevy/yves

Tom Schouten wrote:

>hi martin,
>
>>FYI:
>>just a short description of an observation:
>>
>>same two movies in same patch played use about
>>2*20 to 2*25 % cpu when i decode using pdp_qt~
>>compared to 11+6 % when i use pdp_yqt
>>
>>movies have no audio track so this does not play a
>>role (hopefully)
>>
>>i will just use yqt from now - yet somehow it
>>confused me a bit
>>
>
>me too.. since it is almost the same code, and most of the time should be 
>spent inside the lqt_decode_video call.. strange strange.
>
>can you find out which colourmodel (and codec) is used? the colormodel is 
>reported as
>pdp_qt/qt~: using colormodel x
>
>you can find out which codec is used by playing the movie with lqtplay.
>
>tom
>
>_______________________________________________
>PD-list mailing list
>PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
>http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20030124/d43a5f60/attachment.htm>