[PD] hammerfall and low latency

zmoelnig at iem.at zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Jan 29 00:09:50 CET 2003

Zitiere smoerk <smoerk at gmx.de>:

> with -blocksize 64 i get even bigger latency. -blocksize 4 gives latency
> around 4ms, without dropouts (in realtime mode). i know that the 
> smallest blocksize for the hammerfall is 64, i don't know why it does 
> work with -blocksize 4.
i think there is a weird bug (or feature) that multiplies the blocksize with 
the number of outchannels (or inchannels ?).
So if you specify a blocksize of "4" in 8channel-mode, you will try to get 
a "real" blocksize of "32" which is clamped to 64. (as can be seen in the 
If you would use 16 channels with "-bs 4" , you would still have a real 
blocksize of 64.

But maybe my hammerfall-pd is out of date....


More information about the Pd-list mailing list