[PD] FFTs
e.pkelly
e.pkelly at btopenworld.com
Sun Feb 2 02:22:07 CET 2003
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a cheaper (in CPU terms) way of doing phase-vocoding than the one detailed in the pd documentation (phase-locked vocoder patch)? Do FFTs get cheaper with smaller block~ and window sizes?
Has anyone written externals which implement basic pvoc operations for less MHz?
I can run two FFT re-synthesizers in my signal-driven patch before it's too much (with bonk~ and fiddle~ running also).
Ed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20030202/ccb9dfce/attachment.htm>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list