[PD] PD 4 EM
Jeffrey Hildebrand
jshildebrand at ucdavis.edu
Sat Feb 22 04:49:13 CET 2003
i agree with you to an extent. pd has seen a lot of success and has
grown much from the time and effort of its users, but it's typically only
used by a certain kind of techie person. i really think that pd could
become more of a mainstream type of software in teaching, music production,
and in art. this would only happen with a huge pouring-in of new users.
scott
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:04:41 -0800 (PST)
> "J. Scott Hildebrand" <jshildebrand at ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>
> > if they don't make it, then it's likely you'll never hear
> > another record from then again... and if pd doesn't "make it," it'll never
> > improve and it'll become old dusty software that very few people use.
>
> Sorry Scott, but this statement is completely ridiculous. Pd itself is a
direct contradictory example to what you're saying.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris.
> _________________________________
> chris at mccormick.cx
> http://www.mccormick.cx
> http://www.sciencegirlrecords.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list