[PD] PiDiP 0.8.5 - mp3lame problem

[martin pi]

watch this! it is the official lame-check from
MPlayer - is this normal? never dared to read a
machine-produced configure script, yet maybe this
one is even written by hand

# mencoder requires (optional) those
libs: libmp3lame and divx4linux encore
if test "$_mencoder" != no ; then

  echocheck "libmp3lame (for mencoder)"
  _mp3lame=no
  cat > $TMPC <<EOF
#include <lame/lame.h>
int main(void) { lame_version_t
lv; (void) lame_init(); get_lame_version_numerical(&lv);  printf("%d%d\n",lv.major,lv.minor); return
0; }
EOF
  # Note: libmp3lame usually depends on vorbis
  cc_check -lmp3lame $_ld_vorbis -lm &&
_mp3lame=yes
  if test "$_mp3lame" = yes ; then
    _def_mp3lame="#define HAVE_MP3LAME `$TMPO`"
    _ld_mp3lame="-lmp3lame $_ld_vorbis"
  else
    _def_mp3lame='#undef HAVE_MP3LAME'
  fi
  echores "$_mp3lame"


c'est ca

martin




On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Yves Degoyon wrote:

> ok, i got your config.log and the real reason for this error is :
> 
> configure:4124: gcc -o conftest -g -O2   conftest.c -lmp3lame  -ldl -lz 
> -lbz2  >&5
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2.3/../../../libmp3lame.so: undefined 
> reference to `pow'
> 
> so, it seems the following macro :
> AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame, InitMP3, , AC_MSG_ERROR(streaming requires lame 
> library!!))
> 
> forgets to link with -lm,
> i really don't know how to fix this on my side.
> 
> Yves Degoyon wrote:
> 
> > so, i'm puzzled with the behaviour of configure on debian !!
> >
> > well, you can comment the line,
> > but it's perfectly valid on any other
> > distributions
> > ( i had a redhat at first, but now it evolved to something,
> > hum, else ... )) )
> >
> > 220hex wrote:
> >
> >>yes:
> >>
> >>ldconfig -v|grep lame
> >>        libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> >>        libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> >>
> >>.gif
> >>
> >>Wednesday February 26 2003 16:45, skrev Yves Degoyon:
> >>
> >>>is the location where it is installed is included
> >>>in /etc/ld.so.conf ??
> >>>
> >>>does a 'ldconfig -v' includes the lame libraries ??
> >>>
> >>>220hex wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I reinstalled lame and libmp3lame from the source package, so here's what
> >>>>I've got:
> >>>>
> >>>>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       376246 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.a
> >>>>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          668 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.la
> >>>>lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           19 2003-02-26 01:11 libmp3lame.so
> >>>>-> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> >>>>lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           19 2003-02-25 23:47
> >>>>libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> >>>>-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       347012 2003-02-25 23:47
> >>>>libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> >>>>
> >>>>still not recognised from .configure...
> >>>>
> >>>>.gif
> >>>>
> >>>>Wednesday February 26 2003 15:36, skrev Yves Degoyon:
> >>>>
> >>>>>surely true !! tom !!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>but that's really silly from debian.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>cheers,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>sevy/yves
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Tom Schouten wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>for the lame issue, i think it doesn't find
> >>>>>>>libmp3lame which must be in a weird location
> >>>>>>>on debian ((
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>can't help you more from that distance )
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>maybe it has something to do with the fact that on debian, the
> >>>>>>libmp3lame package has only static libararies?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       352520 Aug 16  2001 libmp3lame.a
> >>>>>>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          668 Aug 16  2001 libmp3lame.la
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>maybe AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame) does not include statics?
> >>>>>>
> >>
> >
> 
> 






       
       		martin pi

       		http://attacksyour.net/pi











	        www.machfeld.net