[PD] PiDiP 0.8.5 - mp3lame problem
Tom Schouten
doelie at zzz.kotnet.org
Wed Feb 26 19:48:08 CET 2003
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 17:38, martin pi wrote:
this seems to work for me (debian)
AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame, InitMP3, , AC_MSG_ERROR(streaming requires lame
library!!) , -lm)
> watch this! it is the official lame-check from
> MPlayer - is this normal? never dared to read a
> machine-produced configure script, yet maybe this
> one is even written by hand
>
> # mencoder requires (optional) those
> libs: libmp3lame and divx4linux encore
> if test "$_mencoder" != no ; then
>
> echocheck "libmp3lame (for mencoder)"
> _mp3lame=no
> cat > $TMPC <<EOF
> #include <lame/lame.h>
> int main(void) { lame_version_t
> lv; (void) lame_init(); get_lame_version_numerical(&lv);
> printf("%d%d\n",lv.major,lv.minor); return 0; }
> EOF
> # Note: libmp3lame usually depends on vorbis
> cc_check -lmp3lame $_ld_vorbis -lm &&
> _mp3lame=yes
> if test "$_mp3lame" = yes ; then
> _def_mp3lame="#define HAVE_MP3LAME `$TMPO`"
> _ld_mp3lame="-lmp3lame $_ld_vorbis"
> else
> _def_mp3lame='#undef HAVE_MP3LAME'
> fi
> echores "$_mp3lame"
>
>
> c'est ca
>
> martin
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Yves Degoyon wrote:
> > ok, i got your config.log and the real reason for this error is :
> >
> > configure:4124: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lmp3lame -ldl -lz
> > -lbz2 >&5
> > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2.3/../../../libmp3lame.so: undefined
> > reference to `pow'
> >
> > so, it seems the following macro :
> > AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame, InitMP3, , AC_MSG_ERROR(streaming requires lame
> > library!!))
> >
> > forgets to link with -lm,
> > i really don't know how to fix this on my side.
> >
> > Yves Degoyon wrote:
> > > so, i'm puzzled with the behaviour of configure on debian !!
> > >
> > > well, you can comment the line,
> > > but it's perfectly valid on any other
> > > distributions
> > > ( i had a redhat at first, but now it evolved to something,
> > > hum, else ... )) )
> > >
> > > 220hex wrote:
> > >>yes:
> > >>
> > >>ldconfig -v|grep lame
> > >> libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> > >> libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> > >>
> > >>.gif
> > >>
> > >>Wednesday February 26 2003 16:45, skrev Yves Degoyon:
> > >>>is the location where it is installed is included
> > >>>in /etc/ld.so.conf ??
> > >>>
> > >>>does a 'ldconfig -v' includes the lame libraries ??
> > >>>
> > >>>220hex wrote:
> > >>>>I reinstalled lame and libmp3lame from the source package, so here's
> > >>>> what I've got:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 376246 2002-06-30 18:04
> > >>>> libmp3lame.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 668 2002-06-30
> > >>>> 18:04 libmp3lame.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19
> > >>>> 2003-02-26 01:11 libmp3lame.so -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> > >>>>lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2003-02-25 23:47
> > >>>>libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> > >>>>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 347012 2003-02-25 23:47
> > >>>>libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
> > >>>>
> > >>>>still not recognised from .configure...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>.gif
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Wednesday February 26 2003 15:36, skrev Yves Degoyon:
> > >>>>>surely true !! tom !!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>but that's really silly from debian.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>cheers,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>sevy/yves
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Tom Schouten wrote:
> > >>>>>>>for the lame issue, i think it doesn't find
> > >>>>>>>libmp3lame which must be in a weird location
> > >>>>>>>on debian ((
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>can't help you more from that distance )
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>maybe it has something to do with the fact that on debian, the
> > >>>>>>libmp3lame package has only static libararies?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 352520 Aug 16 2001
> > >>>>>> libmp3lame.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 668 Aug 16
> > >>>>>> 2001 libmp3lame.la
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>maybe AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame) does not include statics?
>
> martin pi
>
> http://attacksyour.net/pi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> www.machfeld.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list