[PD] gem pix_videoDarwin
Adam Lindsay
atl at comp.lancs.ac.uk
Thu Mar 6 21:53:57 CET 2003
chris clepper said this at Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:38:13 -0600:
>>I looked at the source and guessed about [pix_videodarwin 720 480], and
>>although it created the object and rendered, it was far too pixelated to
>>be showing full resolution. But I'll experiment some more.
>
>i found the flag to set for high_quality and added that to the code.
>there are several other modes and i will look into adding those as
>well.
Thanks. So that others don't take this performance hit, would you
consider dedicating a couple commands (messages to the [pix_videoDarwin]
object) for this? I dunno how you're handling this.
>>That would be helpful, as I noticed that S-Video out on my machine has a
>>minimum resolution of 800x600, which causes a bit of a crash.
>
>s-video has a resolution of 640x480, in fact it has to in order to
>support NTSC (it's actually the _only resolution for NTSC). the OSX
>monitor panel doesn't show it by default for some reason, but if you
>uncheck 'Show modes recommended by display' it will allow 640x480.
I'm actually in PAL-land, but the TV will handle NTSC as well.
What you suggest sounds like it. I'll try it as soon as I can get a turn
on the telly.
>what sort of crash occurs? what's the hardware?
Just Pd falling over. Nothing serious.
HW is a PB12", so the NVidia Go 420.
>>Any chance of putting a titlebar on the non-external display window?
>
>sure, at some point. that requires an event loop for the window,
>which could be tricky. also, another event loop is exactly what
>pd+GEM does not need at this point.
Right. Good point.
But I'm blown away by the performance right now.
Cheers,
adam
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay atl at comp.lancs.ac.uk
Computing Dept, Lancaster University +44(0)1524/594.537
Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list