[PD] PD 0.36-0 and Jack 0.61.0 doesn't work?

Larry Troxler lt at westnet.com
Wed Mar 19 03:02:14 CET 2003


On Tuesday 18 March 2003 05:29, guenter geiger wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Larry Troxler wrote:
> > On Monday 17 March 2003 08:59, guenter geiger wrote:
> > > Hi Larry,
> > >
> > > thanks for reporting the problem. Could it be that pd gets stuck
> > > because it loads all the libraries ?
> > > I have just tested the setup and pd works with the latest
> > > CVS version of jack ..
> > > I am a bit at a loss at this one :(
> > >
> > > Guenter
> >
> > Hello Guenter - I tried today's CVS of jack and have the same result.
> > Which version of pd are you using? I'm using pd 0.36-0 directly from the
> > CCRMA binary RPM. (I did try last night to compile PD from CVS but it
> > seems the build is/was broken - failed at fiddle~).
>
> Yes, I am using the version from CVS. I resolved my problem, there
> was a bug in the jack packages that allowed me to have jackd 0.51 and
> libjack 0.50 isntalled.
>
> I think your problem comes from binary incompatibilities, so you have
> to recompile.

If this means that Jack is still at the stage that I need to get the source 
code for every single application that I use that's jack-aware, I think I 
might need to cut my losses at this point. Who the H*#& has this much free 
time on their hands?

But to Jack's credit, I don't think anyone on their development team suggested 
it was ready for general use, so I can't complain.

>
> Can you report why your compile fails with fiddle~ ?

Well unfortunately I didn't save the warnings (they were warnings that halted 
the build because we use -Werror).

One thing was, is that I didn't realize that the default CVS branch isn't 
actually the latest version. So I don't know if the fiddle build also fails 
on on the devel_36_0  version, since when I realized my mistake I checked out 
that version but hacked the makefile at the same time.



>
> Actually, if you  are at the stage of compiling fiddle there should
> already be a pd in ../bin/pd
> Just try that and look what it does.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Guenter





More information about the Pd-list mailing list