[PD] PD 0.36-0 and Jack 0.61.0 doesn't work?

guenter geiger geiger at xdv.org
Wed Mar 19 11:06:32 CET 2003


On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Larry Troxler wrote:
> If this means that Jack is still at the stage that I need to get the source
> code for every single application that I use that's jack-aware, I think I
> might need to cut my losses at this point. Who the H*#& has this much free
> time on their hands?
>

:) Exactly, this was the main reason I wanted to do demudi  ...
so I ended up haveing to deal with these problems all day long ...

> But to Jack's credit, I don't think anyone on their development team suggested
> it was ready for general use, so I can't complain.

Yes, thats true ....
And to be fair, it is almost there. At least you just have to recompile
and you do not have to change the code like it happend with ALSA at the
beginning.

Guenter


>
> >
> > Can you report why your compile fails with fiddle~ ?
>
> Well unfortunately I didn't save the warnings (they were warnings that halted
> the build because we use -Werror).
>
> One thing was, is that I didn't realize that the default CVS branch isn't
> actually the latest version. So I don't know if the fiddle build also fails
> on on the devel_36_0  version, since when I realized my mistake I checked out
> that version but hacked the makefile at the same time.
>
>
>
> >
> > Actually, if you  are at the stage of compiling fiddle there should
> > already be a pd in ../bin/pd
> > Just try that and look what it does.
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Guenter
>





More information about the Pd-list mailing list