[PD] Re: [PD-dev] set send

[Miller Puckette]

Hi all,

I really think having a "forward" object would be the way to do it compatibly
with Max/MSP, so it's probably better not to add a "set" or other message to
the send object.

cheers
Miller

On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 04:55:55PM +0200, Peter Lundén wrote:
> I think its a nice idea to have the functionality but there is problems 
> with the naming. I vote for a change of the name of the "set address" 
> message in [send].
> 
> --PLu
> 
> guenter geiger wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Hallo,
> >>Krzysztof Czaja hat gesagt: // Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>In most cases the need for retargetting is the consequence of
> >>>a bad design.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>I guess, I never encountered a need for send-setting, that wasn't
> >>solvable with [; $1 $2( in my patches.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >If I have intruduced this in the CVS version (the send set), I am willing
> >to throw it out again and put the settable send/receive stuff into the
> >externals again.
> >
> >Votes ?
> >
> >Guenter
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >PD-list mailing list
> >PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> >http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list