[PD] Re: [PD-dev] set send

Chris McCormick chris at mccormick.cx
Sun Apr 6 04:21:01 CEST 2003


I second this.

Chris.

On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:17:54 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org> wrote:

> 
> I think that we should generally avoid breaking established behaviors 
> whenever possible.  The old behavoir seems decently established, in Pd 
> and Max, so we should probably keep it that way.
> 
> .hc
> 
> On Saturday, Apr 5, 2003, at 06:18 America/New_York, guenter geiger 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> >> Hallo,
> >> Krzysztof Czaja hat gesagt: // Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
> >>
> >>> In most cases the need for retargetting is the consequence of
> >>> a bad design.
> >>
> >> I guess, I never encountered a need for send-setting, that wasn't
> >> solvable with [; $1 $2( in my patches.
> >
> > If I have intruduced this in the CVS version (the send set), I am 
> > willing
> > to throw it out again and put the settable send/receive stuff into the
> > externals again.
> >
> > Votes ?
> >
> > Guenter
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-list mailing list
> > PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> > http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
> 


-- 
_________________________________
chris at mccormick.cx
http://www.mccormick.cx
http://www.sciencegirlrecords.com




More information about the Pd-list mailing list