[PD] maximum of Oscillators

pix pix at test.at
Sun Apr 27 11:38:20 CEST 2003


oh, you mean a test to see how many osc~ objects pd can run
simultaneously?

depends on your cpu. you could build an nqpoly (or clone) compatible
object, so you could easily create many osc~'s and see what the cpu usage
is like.

a note, with nqpoly, you should turn off audio computation while modifying
parameters like the number of instances, as it speeds up the garbage
collection (?) and recreation of the objects.

pix.

On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:23:34 +0100
thomas gorbach <blackinch at t0.or.at> wrote:

> David Sabine wrote:
> 
> >Hello,
> >
> >It appears that oscillators can perform frequencies to 999999 hz and
> >then above 1000000 hz - but the accuracy of the wave forms at that
> >frequency are questionable as PD converts the numbers to 1.0000+e6 etc.
> > Certainly, the
> >resolution of waves above 999999 hz will be diminished?
> >
> >This is obviously far beyond the human ear's audio range.
> >
> >Also, depending on your sample rate, your audio hardware might be
> >incapable of producing frequencies above a certain range.  For example,
> >the highest frequency that a 44.100 khz sample rate can achieve is
> >22.05 khz. Frequencies higher than that are either snipped entirely by
> >your audio hardware or appear as very low frequency artefacts.
> >
> >Hardware that is capable of sampling audio at 192 khz have a maximum
> >frequency output of 96000 hz.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Dave Sabine
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: pd-list-admin at iem.kug.ac.at [mailto:pd-list-admin at iem.kug.ac.at]
> >On Behalf Of thomas gorbach
> >Sent: January 3, 2003 2:35 AM
> >To: PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> >Subject: [PD] maximum of Oscillators
> >
> >hello List
> >
> >1. question
> >is there someone who tried the maximum of oscillators pd can perform ?
> >
> >2. question:
> >if i open a patch with an oscil i get this text.
> >
> >#N canvas 16 64 314 182 10;
> >#X obj 66 54 osc~;
> >#X obj 109 54 osc~;
> >#X obj 66 86 *~ 0.1;
> >#X obj 66 121 dac~;
> >#X floatatom 66 19 5 0 0 0 - - -;
> >#X obj 109 33 + 5;
> >#X connect 0 0 2 0;
> >#X connect 1 0 2 0;
> >#X connect 2 0 3 0;
> >#X connect 2 0 3 1;
> >#X connect 4 0 0 0;
> >#X connect 4 0 5 1;
> >#X connect 5 0 1 0;
> >
> >is there any systematic in the numbering of the boxes ?
> >
> >Greetns
> >TOM
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >PD-list mailing list
> >PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> >http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
> >
> >
> >
> Yes this i know.
> But i'm looking for the amount of oscil pd can produce.
> 
> greetns
> TOM
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list




More information about the Pd-list mailing list