[PD] what pure-data.org needs to have

[bbogart at ryerson.ca]

How about abstractions contributed from the community?
(something nicely searchable like PDB)

B.

----- Original Message -----
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org>
Date: Thursday, May 15, 2003 6:48 pm
Subject: [PD] what pure-data.org needs to have

> 
> Here's a quick list I just compiled of what all the new pure-
> data.org 
> could have:
> 
> "getting help"
> 	docs
> 	tutorials
> 	FAQ
> dev section
> 	howto join SF CVS
> 	various devs and their projects
> downloads
> 	pd packages
> 	pd-externals, etc. from SF CVS
> 	other pd packages/externals
> forums
> 	the pd-list in forums format could be helpful to people who are 
> hesitant to subscribe to the list.
> blog
> 	a good outlet for related news, events postings, etc.
> wiki
> 	site for building local user group pages.
> patch exchange
> 
> Now there is definitely some overlap, so I think we need at least 
> to 
> have a vague definition of what each section is supposed to do 
> rather 
> than just put up everything and the kitchen sink just because we 
> can.  
> That would lead to pure-data.org becoming just as fragmented as 
> the 
> current layout across many sites.
> 
> Did I miss anything?
> 
> .hc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>