[PD] Installing PD under Linux

[Josh Steiner]

yeah, thats true.  i'm developing a synthesizer, and i was originally 
planning on separating the synth core from the gui, so you could choose 
if you need to gui or not.  it occured to me that i heard sometime ago 
that hidden gui objects dont impact the cpu performance.  so it would be 
easier for me to develop it as one abstraction, if you need the gui, 
popup the gui window, other wise dont.  of course this hinges on my 
understanding that hidden gui objects dont impact performance.

btw, its polyfonic now adn has a functioning gui editor for the synth 
parameters... i'll be releasing 0.1 pretty soon now once i work out a 
few of the really obnoxious bugs :)

-josh

pix wrote:

>why have gui objects if they are hidden?
>
>if you plan on opening/closing subpatches during a performance, it
>invariably causes hiccups for me.
>
>pix.
>
>On Fri, 30 May 2003 10:42:51 -0700
>Josh Steiner <josh at vitriolix.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>Problems arise if you use and display too many builtin graphical
>>>objects.
>>>
>>>Guenter
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>i've been working on some heavy graphics patches, do you know it will
>>matter if i have all my GUI stuff "hidden" in a subpatch?  i'm hoping
>>that all the gui objects wont hamper performance when they are not
>>displayed.  
>>
>>-- 
>>____________________________________________________
>>independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>PD-list mailing list
>>PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
>>http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
____________________________________________________
independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com