pd internals (was Re[2]: [PD] switcher?)
CK
x at meta.lo-res.org
Fri Jun 6 12:50:12 CEST 2003
I read:
> - dsp cycles: if i have a complex calculation that requires several pd
> objects, will it take several dsp cycles (one for each object) or is
> it calculated at once. eg, if i have an abstraction that does 100
> calculations (one after another) when i send a bang, would it take
> 100 dsp cycles?
no, every ~ object's dsp routine is called exactly once per dsp_cycle, if
one or several objects fail at doing there calculations on the sample-
buffer in that time you will hear dropouts.
> - how can you switch of the calculation of some generators /
> subpatches / patches? (i would really need this in my patches)
[switch~]
> - abstractions vs externals: i suppose externals would be faster (if
> you want you could even write your external in the assembler
> language of your machine), but require more ram (more code, maybe
> larger classes)... is this correct?
well externals should usually be faster (since they are compiled)
and there are things one simply cannot solve with the internal objects.
HTH
x
--
chris at lo-res.org Postmodernism is german romanticism with better
http://pilot.fm/ special effects. (Jeff Keuss / via ctheory.com)
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list