[PD] send~/throw~ versus patch cord

[pix]

i jsut did a test with nqpoly4, using two grains that were identical
except one had an extra throw-catch pair in it. the one with the throw
catch pair started to max out my system (119% cpu) with 300 voices, but
the straight connected one was still getting only about 68% cpu. a grain
using an s~/r~ connection did only slightly better than throw/catch, using
about 115% cpu.

pix.

On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:21:10 +0200
"Guilherme Carvalho" <guilherme at wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> Hello list,
> 
> I was wondering: is using a lot of throw~/catch~ pairs (or s~/r~) more
> expensive in terms of CPU than connecting objetcts directly with cords?
> Things do look better without all the criss-crossing, but I must save
> all I can in terms of CPU.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Guilherme
> 


--