[PD] suggestion about graph on parent to the developers

Matthew Allen matthew at lith.com
Mon Jun 23 20:42:53 CEST 2003


Miller has stated that GOP is really in its infancy, so I guess any input
towards its development will be appreciated.

I have been doing quite a bit of GOP work, and its really trial and error.
This post:

http://old.iem.at/mailinglists/pd-list//2003-02//002297.html

helps a bit, but it still is trial and error making sure your GOP parts line
up correctly.

m.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Khemma [mailto:mkhemma at orion.it.luc.edu]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:23 AM
> To: pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> Subject: [PD] suggestion about graph on parent to the developers
> 
> Hello,
> 
> 	I don't know if this is possible (because my pd development skills
> are null), but is there a way for you developers to code a specific box
> which the sliders/bangs/etc could be set in so that when you look at the
> parent abstraction, it will look exactly like how you set it up in the
> child rather than appearing all scrunched up? The box could set the
> pixel dimensions of the parent object in some way, and things that the
> user didn't want to show in the parent could be left outside of the box.
> If it could be done then the pd-design/layout would look much cleaner and
> much more flexible. I hope this makes sense to more than just me.
> -Mark .K
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________
> Scanned for viruses on 23 Jun 2003 17:29:41
> No viruses found.
> Virus scanning by http://erado.com




More information about the Pd-list mailing list