[PD] arguments in route object

[Krzysztof Czaja]

hi,

perhaps an abstraction with a [route $1 $2...] in it would be
a more straightforward choice?

If not, a [coll] or similar driving a [gate <nouts>] seems
like a router flexible enough in most cases.

Krzysztof

slow wrote:
 > hi
 >
 > I'm using netreceive and try to use a single subpatch that could receive
 > certain messages on different machines...
 >
 > I wonder if one of you did modify the ROUTE object in order to
 > dynamically change the routing arguments...