[PD] arguments in route object

Krzysztof Czaja czaja at chopin.edu.pl
Fri Jul 4 16:56:16 CEST 2003


perhaps an abstraction with a [route $1 $2...] in it would be
a more straightforward choice?

If not, a [coll] or similar driving a [gate <nouts>] seems
like a router flexible enough in most cases.


slow wrote:
 > hi
 > I'm using netreceive and try to use a single subpatch that could receive
 > certain messages on different machines...
 > I wonder if one of you did modify the ROUTE object in order to
 > dynamically change the routing arguments...

More information about the Pd-list mailing list