[PD] GEM versions

shreeswifty bigswift at ufl.edu
Fri Jul 11 02:24:54 CEST 2003


Yes very disappointing compared to my G4
I am grabbing the CVS binjaries right now.
I have gotten msdn Visual.NET for compiling on windows but all the folks at
school look at th einterface and say "oh wow microsoft really screwed it up.

Is there a simple how to for compiling with this monster?

Pat



-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Heckenberg [mailto:daniel at bogusfront.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 8:20 PM
To: shreeswifty; pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at
Subject: Re: [PD] GEM versions


Hi Pat,

The latest build of the CVS version of GEM for Windows is available at
www.bogusfront.org

You'll find the performance for patches with lots of texture transfers to be
a little disappointing on Windows I suspect, as Microsoft has not optimized
this path as much as Apple.  Please post the results of your comparisons.

Cheers,
Daniel


----- Original Message -----
From: "shreeswifty" <bigswift at ufl.edu>
To: <pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: [PD] GEM versions


>
> Hi folks
>
> i am pretty limited on my linux A/v side save for cinelerra so i am
focusing
> my GEM tests on WinXp and OSX.
> I think i have aquired the most up to date version for OSX but where do i
> locate the newest for windows?
> I was having incredible performance from GEM with my Sony digital 8 on OS
X.
> and Fantastic luck with the tutorial examples.
>
> I would like to see how this stacks up with the windows version.
>
> cheers~
>
> PAt
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>
>







More information about the Pd-list mailing list