[PD] Order of messaging

[David McCallum]

         You could probably skip the last unpack and pack and just have a 
message >add $2 $3| since you only want the second and third components of 
the list.

         Unless I'm missing something here...

         or.... have the two inlets go into a pack, and then into a lister 
(from... zexy, I think. it works like a float object) and bang that lister 
when you need the info sent.

         Might clean things up a bit...

David

At 12:32 13/07/2003, Pixelcorrection at wmconnect.com wrote:
>hi,
>   What I have been doing to organize my message into their correct order 
> is using pack and unpack.
>
>[bang] [inlet] [inlet]
>\         1       /
>  \        1     /
>[pack 0 0 0]
>1
>1
>[unpack 0 0 0]
>        /       /
>       /     /
>[pack 0 0]
>1
>{add $1 $2}
>
>Pack puts the message in the order you want and the bang lets you send it 
>at the right time.  The unpack drops the bang message out, the second pack 
>puts it back in order and the add formats the message for your sequencer 
>object.   This method is helping me to generate csound scores.  By the way 
>is there anyone out there working on a Windows version of the Csound 
>external?  Is anyone using it on linux, and has an experience they would 
>like to share?

.
. David McCallum
.  Music wants to be free
. http://mentalfloss.ca/sintheta
. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20030713/305f1af4/attachment.htm>