[PD] PD n00b: counter kludge

Matthew Allen matthew at lith.com
Wed Jul 23 21:38:55 CEST 2003


Is there a problem with this? I remember a discussion about it a while ago,
but I don't think there was ever a conclusion.

m.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Lavallée [mailto:odradek at videotron.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:20 PM
> To: pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] PD n00b: counter kludge
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Le 23 Juillet 2003 14:11, Matthew Allen a écrit :
> > 	They both do the same thing, I think the second one is a little
> > cleaner and easier to read/figure out what is going on.
> 
> Of course I don't agree, since I prefer my patch...
> One problem with Frank's patch: the f object is indefinitely incremented.
> 
> - --
> Marc
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE/Ht/SQdzoeKQ0PccRAgknAKC+SM8N8qI0QiFEEw4awX7MCSkAKgCcCsB6
> u2ElADPZOaVniwqO1foJTug=
> =2St8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________
> Scanned on 23 Jul 2003 19:37:18
> Scanning by http://erado.com




More information about the Pd-list mailing list