[PD] how should i license patches i release?

[Josh Steiner]

gpl it, sounds like the smart thing to do to me.

-josh

e skogen wrote:

> hi list,
>
> i am considering the release of a simple patch framework that i think 
> may benefit others as a starting point for a more complex performance 
> patch. i want to make it available to anyone, but i don't want someone 
> who uses this patch as a starting point to re-release it for profit in 
> some binary form without distributing their patch as well.
>
> perhaps i'm being paranoid -- patches haven't even been given the 
> option of a binary-only release yet --  but would it make sense to 
> license my work under the GPL? i've briefly considered other licenses, 
> but the GPL seems to make the most sense.
>
> --eric
>
>
>
> ------ http://USFamily.Net/info - Unlimited Internet - From $8.99/mo! 
> ------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list



-- 
____________________________________________________
independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com