[PD] logo or icon?? (my opinion)
hans at eds.org
Thu Oct 23 22:18:33 CEST 2003
This icon below would make a great file icon, since it looks like a
patch. Then the icon for the app would be the logo.
On Thursday, Oct 23, 2003, at 07:11 America/New_York, Andrey Savitsky
> I agree with Marc
>> if the logos and icons are designed to be impressive, there's a
>> high risk that a bunch of clueless newbies will complain about pd's
>> So we should keep it simple, to the extreme. We love screen
> How i see, now there is a choice between logo in Macromedia's style
> (021 -
> this is the best from 007-021) and pure screencapture style (022-030).
> #021 has very nice design, but i'm not sure that pd needs logo like
> this. I
> very like modern graphic design, but if a designer creates the logo
> 021, he expresses
> just one idea - "we are contemporary!", but pd needs its own message
> I think pd already has its own graphical style, embodied in classical
> (historical) logo - we can just type "Pd" in a object or message box :
> All now pd needs (i repeat) is a mythology. This purpose is usually
> by any illustration for a splash screen or some graphic stuff in
> to logo (maybe original graphic design for the installation package).
> And icon is just icon on the desctop. i use my selfmade icons without
> pd-logo for example (see attch).
> If you would like to create a logo, don't begin from an icon, begin
> from a
> legend!!! (than maybe 021 will be best... or 010... or 007. than
> will change)
> best regards,
More information about the Pd-list