pool XML format, was: Re: [PD] re: state saving
Thomas Grill
t.grill at gmx.net
Mon Dec 1 17:31:37 CET 2003
Hey all,
actually, after reading the web a bit, i tend to prefer the following
format...
<pool>
<value><key>1</key><data>60</data></value>
<value><key>2</key><data>51</data></value>
<dir>
<key>bla</key>
<value><key>2</key><data>66</data></value>
<value><key>1</key></value>
</dir>
</pool>
<key> is mandatory, but <data> is not.
The main reason is that a key can be any PD atom (except symbols with
spaces) in pool, and XML attributes must not contain certain characters
(like ' or " , probably others). The format looks a bit more general and
robust to me than the one with the attributes. It also _looks_ more
transformation-friendly....
greetings,
Thomas
>
> So my vote is for your description as shown below.
>
> <pool>
> <value key="1">60</value>
> <value key="2">51</value>
> <dir key="bla">
> <value key="2">66</value>
> <value key="1">44</value>
> </dir>
> </pool>
>
>
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Adam T. Lindsay atl at comp.lancs.ac.uk
> Computing Dept, Lancaster University +44(0)1524/594.537
> Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list