[PD] readanysf~ 0.11 crashes PD

[Thomas Grill]

> > The only difference is that with the new allocation method the PD
> > functions are used, while previous versions of flext used the ones of
> > the c library. I'm not sure if the PD memory allocation can deal with
> > the large number of implicit allocations of the C++ language.
> > The reason for using the PD functions are that they may be faster but
> > even that has to be verified. I'll shortly do some tests...
>
> i see ... but you seem to run the same function again and again ...
>
> if bytes is larger than largealloc, you run new(bytes)
> which ends in an infinite recursion ;-)

oh yes, many thanks for the hint... i introduced a quick fix which is not
ideal, because large allocations should still be done by the c library.
I have still to do some portability tests for the cleaner general solution.

best greetings,
Thomas