[PD] return error values for writesf~ or readsf~

Dan Wilken cubis at comcast.net
Sun Feb 1 07:35:36 CET 2004


While they should not occur, it has happened that in my patch, when 
getting up in the 100s of tracks, my "open" command has somehow been 
missed by my writesf~ object. If this occurs again, I would like the 
patch to be aware of the problem.

Do writesf~ and readsf~ generate some sort of return value? How do I 
catch it?



More information about the Pd-list mailing list