[PD] [PD/MAX] wrap~

[julien.breval at tremplin-utc.net]

thanks for your suggestions, it works better now

> for non-negative input you will get the same output from [%~ 1.],
> as from wrap~.  However, for the whole domain, wrapping pong~,
> [pong~ 1], does the job (although it costs more)
> 
> Krzysztof

> the difference is only if you put a negative sig number you get a 
> negative modulo ([-1;0]  instead of  [1;0]). so if you need positives 
> numbers when you put negatives one ( a la [wrap~]) you must to use a 
> detection of negatives [<~ 0] then a gate~ (or other thing) then [abs~ 
> ] with some [-~ 1] after [%~ 1]. 
> 
> Hope is comprehensible  and excuse my english, if you want I can send 
> you an example. 
> 
> José