[PD] derivation

[marius schebella]

yes, yes, you are so right, z~ is what I was looking for
with my alzheimer I can discover new objects every day...
m.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "vanDongen/Gilcher" <gml at xs4all.nl>
To: <pd-list at iem.at>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] derivation


> Isn't there a z~ object in zexy dat does work for continuous data?
>
> Gerard
>
>
> On Thursday 22 April 2004 10:54, marius schebella wrote:
>
>
> > hi,
> >
> > there is an object lrshift~, ... but does not work for continuous data,
> > because it cannot handle the transition from one signal-vector to the
> > next...
> > so I think you will have to work with a subpatch working in block~ 1
> > blocksize. use for example the nop~ object from zexy and then go to the
> > outlet again. from the original and the "delayed by one sample"-signal
you
> > can easy calculate the derivation of that step with
> > f ' (t)= f (t) - f (t-1).
> >
> > m.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "miha Ciglar" <miha.ciglar1 at guest.arnes.si>
> > To: <pd-list at iem.at>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:05 PM
> > Subject: [PD] derivation
> >
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Is it possible to calculate derivations of an audio signal?
> > How do I do this?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > miha
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-list mailing list
> > PD-list at iem.at
> > http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>
> -- 
> electronic & acoustic musics-- http://www.xs4all.nl/~gml
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list