[PD] open source Pd workshops

[Lex Ein]

NSL - (Nemo Seagull License)
"Mine.  Mine, mine, mine. Mine, mine, mine, mine, mine."
http://www.chrisdiclerico.com/images/mine.jpg
http://www.moviewavspage.com/movies/finding_nemo/mine.wav

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

> On Friday, Apr 23, 2004, at 12:13 America/New_York, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> 
>     Hallo,
>     Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 
>         We should also discuss the license up front. My vote is for
>         Creative
>         Commons ShareAlike (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/
>         ) for
>         the written materials, and GNU GPL for the code.
> 
>     GPL for code is fine, but I'm on a - as Josh would put it, and I like
>     that word ;) - "personal vendetta" against CC licenses, so I'd rather
>     not put my material under this kind of license. Unfortunatly I didn't
>     find another one, that is in widespread use and still fits all people.
>     GNU Free Documentation would be nice in general, but seems to have
>     several problems with several things (see debian.org). Darn, I don't
>     know much else than that I don't like CC, and I can't even put my CC
>     aversion into sensible words.
> 
> 
> 
> Well, it would be good to have some reasons, because as far as I know, 
> the CC ShareAlike license would fit this very well. We could also just 
> GPL and call it a day, but there seems to be reasons to not GPL docs, 
> which I don't really know.
> 
> .hc