[PD] inlet numbering

pix pix at test.at
Mon May 31 19:04:44 CEST 2004


well, if you are atleast looking for precedent to back up some other
justification, the expr[~] objects count inlets starting with 1 ($f1 $f2
etc).

pix.

On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:19:29AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> 
> which one is the best, counting the leftmost inlet as #0, or counting it
> as #1 ? I ask because I have quite a bit of doc and code in which inlets
> are numbered, so before there's too much of it, i'd like to settle this
> issue.
> 
> so i'm looking to know what would be the advantages of doing it one way or
> another, and also, who standardized on calling it #0, and who instead
> chose #1.
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Mathieu Bouchard                       http://artengine.ca/matju
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list




More information about the Pd-list mailing list