[PD] external loading suggestion
mpuckett at man104-1.ucsd.edu
Tue Jul 20 20:48:09 CEST 2004
I agree too... Whenever something is available in Max and also in clashing
libraries, I'm thinking of figuring out the Max compatible one (probably
this will always be the one in cyclone) and putting that in the Pd core.
Also, objects such as abs~, etc., which are in cyclone but seem canonical
should go into Pd. I haven't decided wheether Pd should try to include
the whole of cyclone or not.
also, I want to add a flag to Pd to supperss loading specific classes so
that, when classes are added to Pd , they don't break existing libraries
quite so badly.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 06:26:58PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > I think that we should also use the cyclone [counter]. We should use
> > the Max-compatible objects first, unless there is a very good reason to
> > do otherwise. Other counter-type objects can just as easily have
> > different names. Plus with many of the help files linking to all
> > related objects, it makes it much easier to figure out which specific
> > object serves your purpose.
> I agree here. Max compatibility shouldn't be broken where not
> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see
More information about the Pd-list