[PD] Status and usability of vst~

smoerk smoerk at gmx.de
Sat Aug 7 12:23:53 CEST 2004

Thomas Grill wrote:
> Hey all,
> vst~ is not a secret, it's in cvs. It seems that also the Steinberg
> copyright issues have become better due to the efforts of the FST project.
> The problem is that it always takes some time to make a release package and
> i use to do that when things have been tested to some extent.
> The last time someone mentioned the need for vst~ on the list i posted a
> call for vst~ test reports of all kinds of available plugins. I didn't get
> one single reply - that can mean that either nobody uses vst~ or it's not
> working at all or it's working perfectly.
> So here again... i'd appreciate _very_ much reports of vst~ with all kinds
> of plugins - perfectly working/somehow working (details) /not working at all
> (errors?).
> The other reason for not publishing a binary was a change in the
> architecture, so that a OSX version (and maybe linux FST version) can
> follow.
> I'll upload a binary shortly.

i'll test it then and put comments on 
http://pd.iem.at/pdwiki/index.php?Vst~ (and post it to the list)

More information about the Pd-list mailing list