[PD] random seed
mpuckett at man104-1.ucsd.edu
Thu Aug 26 05:04:19 CEST 2004
I wonder if this is still a problem. I just tried 'random' in linux, gave
it a seed (123), got a seqence out, seeded it again with 123, got the same
sequence out, seeded it with 234, got a different sequence. Have any
of you found that you get the same sequence from 'random' having fed
it two different (integer) seeds !? This would be wrong.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 01:51:13AM +0200, derek holzer wrote:
> David Sabine wrote:
> >To avoid this behaviour, it's best to NOT give a seed at all. Or to
> >a seed that is always different (like the operating system's clock time).
> Precisely my first two attempts! I gave a seed from [shell] which gave
> current time, or none at all. The progression seemed pretty much the
> same no matter what.
> Like I said, I remember it worked different on windoze, so I wonder if
> it has anything to do with PD's access to the random number pool in
> Linux. I guess that's one for Miller or Guenter to puzzel over ;-)
> derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
> ---Oblique Strategy # 130:
> "Question the heroic"
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
More information about the Pd-list