[PD] [GEM]: multiple gemwin

Mathieu Bouchard matju at sympatico.ca
Wed Sep 8 20:23:40 CEST 2004

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Ivan Franco wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2004, at 5:48 PM, chris clepper wrote:
> > Also, speaking just for myself, I have no interest whatsoever in 
> > duplicating features from Nato, Jitter or other software at this 
> > point.  I find those two Max video systems flawed in both technical 
> > and conceptual design,
> It's not about copying other features.
> [...]
> Sorry for the following comment but I'm a bit bothered about how people 
> react when we talk about Max or Nato or Jitter or whatever software 
> similar to PD/GEM/etc...
> I'm really supportive about opensource and I think it's the way to go, 
> but I must mention something that seems good/practical, in my point of 
> view, in those softwares.
> Not comparing or asking for features. Just commenting, since we all 
> want GEM to grow to be more....

Some references for you:


And it's not because it is typically about corporations and research
centres, that it can't apply to organisms, teams, and independent
programmers too.


Mathieu Bouchard                       http://artengine.ca/matju

More information about the Pd-list mailing list