[PD] [dumb] question about [lop~] and [hip~]

[matthew jones]

> I may want to change the cutoff very fast, with big jumps

hmm, this is worrying then.
Are there not any low-pass or high-pass filters in the latest iemlib that
take signal inputs for the cutoff freqs?  I'm sorry, I haven't got Pd here
at work, so I can't check.  But I must say I HAVE noticed clicks even using
the control (ie. non signal) version of [line].  I think my block size was
64, but whatever this value is the output from [line] will always be a
significant jump compared to using [line~] - unless you make the [line]
change REALLY slowly of course!
Good luck

Matt

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.loopit.org/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <julien.breval at tremplin-utc.net>
To: "CK" <x at meta.lo-res.org>
Cc: <pd-list at iem.at>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] [dumb] question about [lop~] and [hip~]


> Selon CK <x at meta.lo-res.org>:
>
> > I read:
> > .
> > .
> > > [vcf~]). So, do I need to add a [line] object between this frequency
> > > parameter and the controlling interface (basically a time-jumping
number),
> >
> > > for the filter
> >
> > depends on how fast you plan to change the value (or have big jumps), in
> > short, since I don't think [lop~] does any inernal smoothing I guess it
i
> > won't hurt.
>
> I may want to change the cutoff very fast, with big jumps. Indeed, I'm
making a
> new filter for a granular synthesis patch, and this filter is based on
several
> [lop~] and [hip~] filters.
>
> I think I will add a [line] with a variable time resolution
>
>