[PD] Pd on pure64 : Wrong value of array or tabread !

[guenter geiger]

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Jamie Bullock wrote:
> This might seem like an obvious question, but I'm not sure I understand
> the issues. What is the advantage of running PD on a 64-bit
> architecture? Does it run faster without code modifications (just
> compiler option changes)?  Is there a 64-bit optimised version?

Currently there are only disadvantages running Pd on a 64 bit machine.
Later it will probably be the same, there are no 64bit optimisations.
I think for signal processing there is not much gain going to 64 bit.
The hardware sellers want to make us believe that we need 64bit, of
course.

Guenter

>
> Jamie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pd-list-admin at iem.at [mailto:pd-list-admin at iem.at] On Behalf Of
> cdr
> Sent: 03 November 2004 17:12
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd on pure64 : Wrong value of array or tabread !
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 05:52:19PM +0000, ludovic watteaux wrote:
> > Hi !
> > If anybody use pd on a pure64 linux environement (Debian sid) for a
> > amd64
> > machine and can help me !
> > I've problem with array and tabread , tabplay~, ... :
> >
> > I open the tabread help and clic the message box to put the values in
> > array99 and the output of the  index of [tabread array99] is totaly
> > wrong.
> >
> > Morever i can't change the name of an array because i can't ha
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>