[PD] Re: [PD-dev] nameclashes
gr at grrrr.org
Thu Nov 4 23:57:23 CET 2004
i'd prefer the namespace approach with some separation character that has a
clear meaning and isn't otherwise widely used. e.g. / | _would be ok.
Communication is always good but shouldn't be a must. There may be people
contributing things that aren't good at it.
I don't like the flag approach very much since it's more a private "fix",
not a general solution.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Blechmann" <TimBlechmann at gmx.net>
To: <pd-dev at iem.at>
Cc: <pd-list at iem.at>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 11:19 PM
Subject: [PD-dev] nameclashes
> hi all ...
> i'm currently thinking of a way to solve the nameclash problem (counter,
> scale, prepend, gate...)
> here are some suggestions for a solution ... with some pros and cons:
> - namespaces: add the library name like library/object or
> pros: - selectable at runtime
> - the patch will work exactly as you expect, since you see that object
> is from library
> cons: - "/" is already used for the search path (shouldn't be a big
> problem), "::" are two chars
> - only works if an object is compiled as library ... if a
> library is split to single externals (like the build system does) pd
> is not aware of the library name
> - startup flav: having another flag like -force library/object or -force
> pros: - easy to use
> cons: - you can't use both library1::object and library2::object
> - behaviour of the patch depends on startup flags (less portable)
> - communication: figure out, if the external name is already in use
> pros: - no implementation effords
> cons: - not really working (that's why we've got these problems *g*)
> - standard behaviour: if object1 is doing the same as object2, except
> that it is missing one feature, add this feature to object1, if they
> behave exactly the same, the nameclash isn't a problem any more ...
> (escept for the waste of memory)
> pros: - as above
> cons: - as above
> personally i'd prefer the communication in combination with a startup
> flag ... but i'm curious about other ideas or comments ...
> cheers ... tim
> mailto:TimBlechmann at gmx.de ICQ: 96771783
> After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space
> would say "I want to see the manager."
> William S. Burroughs
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
More information about the Pd-list