[PD] a [wrap~] for control computation ?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Tim Blechmann wrote:
>>>Then, for example, zexy.wrap would be a different object than
>>>iem.wrap,
>>
>>and
>>
>>>there would not be any name clashes.
>>
>>or zexy/wrap and iem/wrap as we recently agreed....
>>Anyone working on that issue already?
> 
> not yet ... but if you post a feature request on the tracker, someone
> can assign it to me ... (i hope i'll find some time for that, next week
> or so)

this is what i was referring too yestereve when saying to günther "i 
give up too; i have checked it it"

so it should be in the cvs right now


mfg.a.srd
IOhannes