[PD] gem & messaging
cgc at humboldtblvd.com
Fri Dec 17 16:46:26 CET 2004
Perhaps I don't understand what you are trying to do, but why not use
the GEM specific [separator] [pix_separator] objects?
Also, splitting a GEM chain without these objects will mean that each
chain operates on the same set of data, so the pix_ data and GL states
won't be unique to each.
On Dec 17, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
> hi all ...
> i've got a problem with a simple gem patch that's related to the way
> handles pixes ...
> my patch looks like this:
> t a a
> | |
> | |do a
> do b
> but the |do a| part changes the state of the picture ... this for the
> although i should have the same message to work on (coming from
> pix_video), i'm working on two different messages ...
> for my taste, this doesn't follow the dataflow language of pd any more,
> since two messages that should have the same behaviour, behave
> any idea, how to solve that?
> cheers ... tim
> mailto:TimBlechmann at gmx.de ICQ: 96771783
> After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space
> would say "I want to see the manager."
> William S. Burroughs
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
More information about the Pd-list