[PD] send~ and receive~ issues
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Jan 24 16:40:36 CET 2005
Piotr Majdak wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a problem with the latency between some parts of my patches -
> some of them are delayed by 64 samples (=block size). I think I've
> created some [r~]s before other [s~]s, which would lead to this
> behaviour. But: I don't know which objects are affected and I've got
> more than 50 [s~]s and [r~]s ;-)
>
> Is it possible to determine the order of [s~] and [r~] having a look to
> the patch files?
now, because they are not connected
>
> I'd like to apply the suggestion of Miller to delete and recreate all
> [r~]s, but what I don't know is what should I do:
> - recreate the single [r~] object in the abstraction "dac.pd" or
> - recreate all "dac.pd "abstractions in the subpatch "DAC" or
> - recreate the subpatch "DAC" itselft in the main patch or
> - something else?
forget it...
the solution is order-forcing, as described in
3.audio.examples/G05.execution.order.pd
mfg.a.sdr
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list