[PD] send~ and receive~ issues

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Jan 24 16:40:36 CET 2005

Piotr Majdak wrote:
> Hi!
> I have a problem with the latency between some parts of my patches - 
> some of them are delayed by 64 samples (=block size). I think I've 
> created some [r~]s before other [s~]s, which would lead to this 
> behaviour. But: I don't know which objects are affected and I've got 
> more than 50 [s~]s and [r~]s ;-)

> Is it possible to determine the order of [s~] and [r~] having a look to 
> the patch files?

now, because they are not connected

> I'd like to apply the suggestion of Miller to delete and recreate all 
> [r~]s, but what I don't know is what should I do:
> - recreate the single [r~] object in the abstraction "dac.pd" or
> - recreate all "dac.pd "abstractions in the subpatch "DAC" or
> - recreate the subpatch "DAC" itselft in the main patch or
> - something else?

forget it...

the solution is order-forcing, as described in 


More information about the Pd-list mailing list