[PD] cos~, feature or bug? (feature)
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu Feb 24 09:33:55 CET 2005
august wrote:
>
>
> can someone please examine the attatched patch for me and see why I get
> WAY different values for [cos~] and [expr~ cos($v1)] ?
>
because [expr~] is mathematically correct and takes values from 0..2pi
(and wraps)
[cos~] is a there to make an oscillator with a [phasor~] and thus takes
values from 0..1 (it is very invconvenient if you have to scale the
phasor~ to -pi..+pi if you want to make a sine out of it.
the attached patch shows how to make them the same
(note that they do not exactly make the same, since [expr~] really
evaluates the cosine of the argument, while [cos~] just does a
table-lookup and some interpolation)
mfg.ad.r
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: testcos.pd
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20050224/e3cc50ac/attachment.asc>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list